Category Archives: Pharmaceutical Threats

Easy In, Hard Out

Published / by Lee Kessler / 1 Comment on Easy In, Hard Out

Years ago, a business mentor of mine gave me some great leadership advice. He reminded me that, as leaders, we are often in a position to insert something into the organization, or to change something with the team. The temptation to put something into a group is nearly irresistible.

So, he cautioned me, that before I would put anything into the business team, to ask myself, “was this something I wanted to have in there permanently, duplicated over and over by others, until it became a permanent part of the culture? He explained to me that it is very easy to put something into a group, or activity, but that it is very hard–if not impossible–to take it out once it takes root.

When you try to take it out, he coached me, you will meet resistance, emotionality, push-back, anger, and mutiny even. People do not like to let go of something they have embraced. They will cling to it even if it is no longer a relevant issue.

And that, my friends, is precisely the danger we face today with the China Virus lockdowns, and restraints. Our government has a tendency at all levels to put in controls, restraints, even repression in order to control some situation that appears out of control to the bureacrats.

Take for example the TSA screenings mandated at all airports, and forced upon all citizens following 9/11. I am not debating whether or not that invasion of privacy, and massive inconvenience, is public policy you agree with or don’t agree with. What I am pointing out is that they started this even before 9/11. Airports put in severe restrictions on going to the gates following the Atlanta Olympics bombing. That was in the 90’s, and that is still in effect today.

Post 9/11, the TSA check-ins were put in, to protect us from terror attack. It has been almost 20 years since then, and much more sophisticated ways have been developed to ensure our safety. Requiring every person to go through the machines is not necessary today, yet those machines remain in place. They were easy in, and hard out.

If you doubt what I just said, ask yourself, what is it that allows you to get a TSA Pre-check? You pay money, and somehow you are “checked” and allowed to board with not much more than identification. What tools did they use to satisfy themselves that you are OK to travel? Hmmm?

Which brings me to lockdowns, “home-arrests,” destruction of small businesses–all done initially to protect us from a new virus that spreads, and can kill. Easy in.

That was 10 months ago, when everything was unknown. Yet 10 months later–when we know its origin now, know its DNA, have developed very successful and multiple therapeutics to treat anyone who gets it and gets quite ill, and have developed and released two and soon-to-be three vaccines to protect the whole world from even getting it–you are being pressured, and threatened, and coerced into sheltering in place. You are being told it is noble for you to stand by as your fellow citizens lose their businesses. You are told it is just unavoidable collateral damage that millions of Americans have now sunk into despair and depression. You are pummeled if you even raise the certain truth that locking children out of school may cost us an entire generation, and destroy the lives of tens of millions.

All that done purportedly to save you! And God help you if you even dare to ask the questions, “Do we really need all this just to keep me safe? Can’t I be responsible for myself, and my family? Does everyone need to suffer now? What exactly is the current mortality rate of this disease? Is it true that the death rate is now down to between 1.5 and 1.8 %? Doesn’t that mean all the great work that we put “in” has worked?

Is it not time for us to take some of this “out?”

Watch what happens to you when you even ask any of the questions I just asked. It went “in” easy–this thing called complete power and control over a population. It is going to go “out” hard. You are going to have to work hard to free yourself–if you ever do.

You may ask why people make it hard to take something out that is no longer needed, or not needed in its harshest and most draconian form. Follow the money, my friends. It will always come down to the money. Those who love power and control also love money.

They may care about you, but it is on a much lesser priority than their caring about money.

Easy in, hard out. So be it. Let’s get it done though, lest we end up 20 years from now still living with masks, fear, social distance circles, hostile looks and comments, rubber gloves, and isolation from those we care about.FacebookTwitterEmailRedditLinkedInShareEditSearch for: 

About Me

Lee Kessler is an author, television actress, screenwriter, playwright, and stage director. Read more

Recent Posts

Categories

Archives

Incoming TomatoesPowered By: WordPressSkip to toolbar

Log Out

How You Know You’ve Been Conned

Published / by Lee Kessler / 1 Comment on How You Know You’ve Been Conned

Pfizer applied for Emergency Use Authorization for their Covid-19 vaccine immediately upon completing the trials successfully. Great Britain’s health organization met immediately and approved it for use. People in Great Britain started receiving the vaccine. Even Bahrain embraced it.

Not here, though. Despite the fact the President had authorized millions of doses to be manufactured in advance, and ready the second the drug was approved–and tasked a General to handle logistics and distribution–the United States did not launch quickly.

Why? The FDA. Despite the urgency of getting the vaccine out–with the whole world waiting for it, and the threat of more Americans becoming infected and possibly dying, the FDA set their hearing almost three weeks after the application was made.

Geez, I hope this didn’t interrupt your golf game, FDA!! They were in no rush. They set a December hearing, held it, and then waited another two days to approve it.

And that is how you know you have been conned.

Is the virus real? Yes. Is it deadly? For some, yes. For those who are very sick, are the therapeutics essential? You bet. For those who are afraid of getting it, whose lives have turned into a virtual house arrest, should the vaccine arrive “yesterday,” as the saying goes? Yes.

If our officials were truly concerned about all the “news” about rising infections and the spread of new cases–and the ensuing percentage of deaths that could occur each day the virus is spreading–why would they not hold their hearing immediately, even in the middle of the night if necessary? After all, by their logic, each day that goes by, more people are getting this virus. And if more people are getting it, more people will die, right? So, why would you wait even one day to authorize the release of a preventative vaccine? Why would you risk even one more American life?

After all, we have been told and told and told and told that we have to stay locked down until a vaccine arrives. We have been told we are killers to even want to try to work, or save our businesses, or even take a walk–that we must shrink and restrain ourselves from all normal activities until the vaccine arrives.

So, why the three week delay in even reviewing the request? Is it that they don’t care that more Americans in that three weeks would be exposed to and contract the disease, possibly die from it? Are those unsuspecting Americans unimportant? How many did contract it from Nov. 20-Dec.11?

Apparently this virus is not really that great a concern to them. It’s the lack of sense of urgency at the FDA that tells you, you have been conned! It is a real threat, but not one that should have stopped you cold for 10 months. The President and his team moved heaven and earth to get a vaccine created, only to have a mysterious hold interposed. Friends, if they had started the review on Nov. 20 when the request first came in–after all it wasn’t like the whole world hasn’t been waiting for this, and they knew it was coming–and if the review took 20 days, we might accept it as “procedural” and “cautionary.” But to not even start the review until Dec. 9 is a glaring oddity.

Either this virus is not as threatening as you have been led to believe, or our FDA is incompetent and tone deaf. If this is a reflection of their “professionalism,” I certainly don’t want any form of government control of my health care.

Someone took this virus and used it for other purposes, for other agendas. And the sooner, my friends, you realize that, the better. As the saying goes–Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

The Unasked Question?

Published / by Lee Kessler / 2 Comments on The Unasked Question?

There is one question I doubt was asked, let alone answered. I have a mind that asks the obvious sometimes. You probably do as well, so let’s ask it.

If “essential businesses” were able to quickly maneuver to keep their employees and customers safe, and thereby remain open for business, why would we assume that “non-essential” businesses couldn’t also adapt to keep their employees and customers safe? Hmmm.

Did the governors and mayors in America ask these businesses HOW they could change their operating basis to stay open, or did they just decide to shut them down, and to hell with the outcome?

This is America–a Free Enterprise, Capitalist society–that is renowned for the innovation and adaptability of its entrepreneurs. Government bureaucrats may not be able to turn on the dime, but my experience with entrepreneurs in this country is they are creative, strong, brave, flexible, and if they had been asked, they would have answered.

If someone couldn’t satisfy their local government, well then, they would remain closed. If they could, they would have been allowed to remain open.

What I want to know, and you should too, is DID ANYONE EVEN ASK THEM TO PRESENT THEIR IDEAS? Were they even given a chance? And, if not, WHY NOT?

Social Distancing & the First Amendment

Published / by Lee Kessler / 4 Comments on Social Distancing & the First Amendment

The First Amendment to the Constitution includes the five freedoms: Freedom of Religion, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of the Press, the Right to Petition, and the Right to Assemble Peaceably.

Webster’s defines assemble as: “to meet together.” And defines assembly as: “a body of persons gathered together (as for discussing and making laws, worship, or entertainment)”

The right to peaceful assembly has long been an underpinning to our Republic. The people have the right to come together–even to march in protest–if the assembly is peaceful. As simple as it sounds, it is one of the proud elements that distinguishes us from other authoritarian or totalitarian governments and societies.

Today, in order to handle a real medical threat, Americans are voluntarily surrendering one of their First Amendment Rights for the good of their fellow countrymen. Our federal government, and most certainly our state governments are demanding of us that we “social distance,” which encompasses everything from staying 6 feet away from a neighbor while walking your dog, to standing 6-10 behind someone at the grocery store, to the inability to attend any movie, concert, church or restaurant gatherings, sporting events, work, classes, business conferences, and even political rallies.

Our freedom to assemble is temporarily suspended. When this pandemic has passed, and when people are allowed to engage again in the life they knew before we were told to stay away from each other, please make sure that your FULL right to assembly is restored. History has shown that once rights are suspended, they very often are not fully restored. There in fact occurs an erosion of the rights–always promoted as being in the “public good.”

We should and will be responsible citizens toward our brethren, but in my opinion we must be on guard for those within our government who will push our President to maintain some “social distancing,” even while allowing most gatherings to resume.

You never want to relinquish your right to march in the streets in peaceful protest. You never want to relinquish your right to call for a meeting to discuss the issues relevant to your work, your religion, or your government. You never want to relinquish your right to invite however many people you want and can afford to your wedding. You never want to allow your business expansion to be limited to only “so many people.” You never want to surrender your right to have as many customers in your establishment as the Fire Department allows, and the customers will tolerate.

I know for a fact that in Communist China, the citizens do not have the right to assemble. Meetings of only a very small size are allowed, and even those have to be permitted, and will be monitored by a political officer. For totalitarians have always known that if the people can not get together in locations–if they can be kept physically separated– they can be subjugated and controlled. And, even more importantly, they can not plot, let alone execute an overthrow of the regime that is enslaving them.

A long way from life in America you say? It was. But, now a perfect out-of- our-control phenomenon that kills people may have changed that. If we are alert, and vigilant, and desirous of our normal freedoms, we will return to our normal life.

But, mark my words, as soon as the virus has passed, someone in Washington will start lobbying for a “new normal” in how often and how much we can associate with each other, and assemble in crowds and groups. It will happen. It will be justified by the goal of saving lives in the future. If we just permanently revoke some of our current freedoms, we can insure that people in the future will be safer. That will be the case that is made, and it will be forced upon the President.

This is an argument that a particular political group (not a party, as members of both major parties subscribe to this philosophy) uses in every area: use of land restrictions, use of natural resources, medical responses, gun ownership battles, use of dangerous medications. The group always promotes the need to sacrifice the “now” for the “future” and has always been willing to trod on the rights of us living today for some vision they have of a future. They have a fear of the future, and instead of working to create the future they desire, they usually resort to limiting our freedoms today, in the hopes that such action will eliminate the future they fear.

It is driven by incompetence. Lacking confidence that they have the competency, they restrict the thought, voice, and movement of anyone who might be more competent.

Please take heed here. I am writing this from my bunker in Florida–dutifully doing what I can to help my fellow Americans. I do not have resentment, and I do not think it is necessarily an unwise choice in the “present” For the moment. But, if we are not allowed to return to our forms of entertainment; if businesses never recover because we are not allowed to assemble in the restaurants or at the ball fields, or the theme parks, and beaches; if permits for demonstrations are denied because there would be too many people in too much proximity; if voting at the voting booths is eliminated for a far more corruptible mail in-vote; if candidates are restricted as to the size of their rallies; if we are not allowed to fly again, and not allowed to create major business conventions, you will read a very different message from me.

For now, wait, serve your countrymen, and be vigilant when normalcy returns. Observe EVERY politician in Washington, or every bureaucrat, who wants you to surrender part of the First Amendment. Do not allow them to do that.

The next Blogs: “He Took the Bait.” And “None Dare Call it Sedition”

“The Big Reveal”–The Underlying Cause of Mass Shootings

Published / by Lee Kessler / 3 Comments on “The Big Reveal”–The Underlying Cause of Mass Shootings

To begin with, buckle up everybody.   This Blog is going to be a rough ride for some of you.   For others it will be a confirmation of what you already know, or suspected.  It will require a paradigm shift to see the truth of it.   But, it is there.   It is true.   You were looking at it all along, but through a different paradigm.

For those of you who have read the three novels that became the White King Trilogy, you probably had a paradigm shift or two as you made the journey with Andy Weir and Brian Washington Carver.   If you have not read these books, I highly recommend you do so, as soon as possible–for your own mental health.   And get all of your angry unhinged friends and family to read these novels too.  They were written to reveal truth, and to produce hope and understanding, while having a lot of fun reading them.   Read the comments by Amazon readers, and you judge for yourself whether I succeeded or not.

But, time is short.   The situation is critical in the US.   And I am going to attempt to do for you in a Blog what frankly is much better done in a novel.   It is the same truth, however.  You will just have to be very brave, and very desirous of solutions, to slow down, read this, digest it, and then see what you now see after your paradigm shift.

Here are the questions:  Why are we in the US experiencing so many mass shootings (or van attacks, knife attacks, bombs etc.)?   And why is the frequency increasing?  The answer to these questions was set up in “White King and the Doctor,” and then exposed in the novel “White King Rising.”  These are the first two books in the trilogy and they `remained #1 and #4 top customer-rated books in political fiction on Amazon Kindle for 8 months!  They address a global enemy and attack line which, in order to succeed, has to neutralize the United States.   The books deal with the strategies and tactics deployed by a brilliant enemy.  And the books reveal the real target of the attack.

Buckle up.   I asked myself back in 2004, “If I wanted to take down the United States, how would I do it?   Who would I target?  What would I do to them?  Who would I use to administer the death blows?  And I answered those questions for myself, and for you, in the novels I subsequently wrote.

But, one of the strategies was to use a Trojan Horse.   Plant it inside the United States, and let the enemy slide out from the belly of the horse and attack at will–inside our own homes.  To understand how that works, you need to remember this.  Never forget it.  A Trojan Horse is accepted as a gift.   You welcome it.  You embrace it as a friend, a solution, and a wonderful gift.  You are grateful for it. And, my friends, it will KILL you!  Worse yet, you do it to yourself by accepting the Trojan Horse.

For some years I had watched the exceptional work of Citizens Commission on Human Rights–a mental health watchdog group.   I learned a great deal from their exposes, and their valiant efforts to check the power of the pharmaceutical companies–most specifically as it related to the creation of, administering of, and promulgation of mind-altering psychiatric medications.  (I challenge you to go to their website https://www.cchr.org/ to explore this in depth.)

But for our purposes today, I want to call your attention to something you have observed, but probably didn’t really “get.”   There are black box warnings on these medications.   There are disclaimers during every TV or radio ad for these drugs.   The pharmaceutical companies were forced to do this by the organization I just mentioned.   Here’s why.

Next time you turn on the TV, note, when the side-effects of the tantalizing drug the ad is promoting are being listed, that with many medications known side-effects range from headache, rash, and diarrhea to thoughts of suicide or homicide.   Now I don’t care how sick you are, you are probably not going to choose a medication that might cause you to kill yourself, or someone else!

The manufacturers will argue that the risk of that side effect is much lower than the risk of some of the more mundane side effects. They probably even have an “acceptable” risk percentage which they take to the FDA.  The issue is, and it should be obvious, the percentage should be zero.   Otherwise an unsuspecting patient may take something that will cure their sleeplessness, or irritable bowel syndrome, but will cause them to kill themselves.   That might be a good strategy if you want to reduce the planetary population and bring people into addiction so that you can control them.   But, it sure isn’t what we expect when we take a medication for a physical situation–especially when the medication is recommended by someone we trust.   Who is that?   The medical professionals.

The black box warnings talk about ideation of suicide or homicide.  So, what is “ideation?” In psychology it is defined as: (buckle up) thoughts about suicide which may be as detailed as a formulated plan. The same is true for homicidal ideation.   What’s important is that it is not just detailed thoughts about killing oneself and/or others, it can involve extensive planning of how to do that.  Thus the apparency of premeditation.

Those who have experienced this have talked about having uncontrollable thoughts and ideas about killing, compulsions which seem to come from no where, and which they can’t seem to control.   At the very least this is devastating to their confidence in themselves and their sanity, and at the worst, results in actions taken–whether they want to do it or not.

Although the cultural issues we face may seem complex, although there may be contributing factors like isolation, bullying, violent computer games, domestic abuse, violent movies etc., the actual underlying cause is likely to be proven to be something much simpler.   No less devastating, but much simpler.

I learned from a mentor long ago that when things seem so complex that we get confused, stuck, or hopeless in confronting them, it is because there are lies in the mix.  When one gets down to the simplicity, there is hope.   Truth lies in simplicity, not in complexity.   That’s why you see everyone tearing themselves apart trying to solve the mass shootings etc. in this country.   They are mired in a complexity.   And the complexity camouflages and obscures the true cause.  And, it may lead to solutions that become an even worse problem.   Witness the confusion in Washington today as every Tom, Dick, and Harry proposes their solution.

Here’s the simplicity:   Do a study to find out how many of these mass murderers were on some kind of psychotropic medication, or had just come off one.   (I believe Citizens Commission on Human Rights has been tracking this.)  Buckle up again.  I believe that if this study is done thoroughly and honestly, the percentage will be nearly 100%–if not 100%

There can always be some whacko that would have done it anyway, as they are a true homicidal sociopath.   But, in the case of most US shooters, they are mostly young boys or men who–although perhaps odd or disturbed–had never done a harmful or criminal act in their life.  Ask yourself, “Could it be they were placed on a medication by some well-meaning person who never paid attention to the black box warnings?   Could it be the drug itself caused the aberrant behavior and carnage?”

If the percentage is as I expect, you are looking at a simple truth.   The drugs which were supposed to be a defense against undesirable  mental phenomena (depression, aggression, anxiety etc) are actually an offensive chemical.   They cause the thing they were supposed to prevent.

At this point, you are going to argue with me that so many have been helped by various medications and the people did not display any of these killer side effects.   That is likely true.   Some side effects are tolerable and worth the risk.   But, what parent is going to want to take the risk that their teenager turns out to be one whose negative reaction to the drug is on the extreme end? What parent wants to take the risk that the medication they are giving could turn their child into a stone cold killer?  Russian roulette?   Suppose you or someone you know is the “unlucky” one.

Only a small percentage will get ideations of homicide, and a smaller percentage yet will likely pick up a gun or any other weapon and kill people.   So, why is the frequency increasing?

The answer is also simple.   It is not that we as a people are becoming more evil.  I understand that close to 1 in 4 Americans is now on some kind of dangerous psychiatric medication (79 million. 8 million are children, 1 million under the age of 5, and 200,000 under the age of one.) In 2013 it was 1 in 6. So, even if the percentage of people who will experience an extreme negative side effect and become killers remains the same as when the drug company made the drug, the larger quantity of people using these drugs insures that the quantity of mass murderers will increase.  Here is an example.  This is not an actual statistic, just an example for you to “think” with:  .5% of 360,000 Americans is one thing (1800). .5% of 360,000,000 is a much larger number (1.8 million).   Same percentage.   Larger pool.  Larger outcome.

IF one finds that all the mass murderers we have struggled to understand in recent years were on psychiatric medications, or had just gotten off from them, the solution is simple.  Stop promoting psychotropic medications like the anti-depressants, anti-psychotic, and anti-anxiety medications.   They are addictive at best, and deadly at their worst.  Then safely wind it down.  Take people safely through the withdrawals.   Don’t focus on the “triggers.”   They exist.   But, without the underlying drug influence, the “triggers” of life are just that–life issues.  Without the underlying drug, no bad act results.

It is important for you to note also that these drugs are not always labeled as psychotropic medications.   They may carry different names from something like Prozac or Xanax etc.   They may be prescribed for physical situations that are very real.   You will know them however by the stated side effects that the manufacturer has been forced to list.   If you see thoughts of suicide, increased aggression, or even homicide, listed, just know that even if the drug is being promoted for your migraines for example, it nonetheless has the potential side effects of the dangerous psychotropic meds.

We can not wait until the Pharmaceutical Industry has done such a good job marketing their wares that 1 in 2 Americans is on meds which may turn the user into a mass murderer.  The doctors and the manufacturers will try to distract you and confuse you.   They are diving in right now to say, “We need more Mental Health.   We need more screening.   We need more preventative medication (defense). They are doing this because they know it will be easier for them to get  you to capitulate and do more “Mental Health” than it will be for them to get you to give up guns.   They are also very smart and know that the Constitution prohibits certain knee-jerk solutions.   But, if we do something that is constitutional to ourselves, by our own choice, they can win.  And they can never be faulted.  We did it to ourselves.

No. What we need is some good offense of our own.   Find out the common denominator.   Approach this rationally and scientifically.    Work backwards to the source.

And then be prepared for the fight of your life, my friends.

There is in fact an enemy who is doing something to you.   Until now, he has been camouflaged and contained in the Trojan Horse.  He has been hidden.  That enemy has his reasons and his motives.   Do not expect him to give up without a fight.

My prayer for you is that you are not ON any of these medications when you try to solve this.

All of this is of course my opinion based upon my research.  You could dismiss this Blog saying, “well that’s just her opinion!”  You could.   But, do so at your own peril.  Worse yet, at the peril of your children.