Category Archives: Corruption

Who Benefits?

Published / by Lee Kessler / Leave a Comment

Well, the “trial” is over. The acquittal is won. Millions were spent. And the politicians who smugly think they won by bringing the coup attempt all the way to the Senate, and to the final step of an Impeachment of a President, have been flimflammed.

Mitt Romney doesn’t know it yet. Joe Biden doesn’t know it yet. Nancy Pelosi and even Adam Schiff don’t know it yet. But, they were hood-winked, bamboozled, hustled, and the victim of any other word for conned that you want to use.

Ironic, actually. Except for this truth. One is blind and stupid in areas wherein they have committed crimes. So, if you have felt that these people were just stupid, ignorant, or corrupt, think again. Their own “crimes” from times gone past caught up with them, causing them to miss seeing the obvious. Or, if they did see it, their own crimes caused them to go into agreement, and become a co-actor.

Time will unravel much of this mystery, and expose the culprits who conceived it and pulled it off. I think you all may figure it out earlier than most if you will ask yourself: Who benefits?

Who benefits from a “revelation” by a Whistleblower? (By the way, don’t fall for the propaganda line that Whistleblowers are to remain anonymous. They are NOT to remain anonymous. They are to be protected from retribution such as being fired etc., but due process dictates that they can not be anonymous.)

Surely Trump did not benefit. Neither did Biden. Nor his son. Nor the corruption-fighting President of the Ukraine. Nancy Pelosi did not benefit. Her legacy now is one of connivance and perfidy. Schiff did not. He is too dumb to know he did not benefit. But, he is the subject of ridicule.

Mitt Romney did not. His political career is over. CNN did not. They are a disgrace in the world of TV news. The New York Times did not. They have fallen for anonymous, unsubstantiated accusations so many times, the public wonders if the Times itself is the source of these slanderous reports.

The FISA courts did not. Congress may not renew this national security tool due to the apparent abuse of power.

Who benefits by knocking out Joe Biden for sure, and by hopefully knocking out the President as well–or at the very least damaging him so much that he would not be a formidable adversary? Think, my friends.

Who got caught triggering–to date–the largest, most dangerous political dirty trick of all time? And who pulls that person’s strings? Who is the brains behind this whole 3-year-long national nightmare? The answer is in front of you. Just step back, step up a thousand feet, and look.

You will see it. Two people. One who launched the rumor-line , out of a blind, personal ambition, and one who masterminded its implementation. His motive? Destruction and control.

I have spoken of him many times. He is not as smart as he thinks he is, but you got to give him points for determination.

Hint: He lived in the shadows, and has been the source of this 5th Column that almost destroyed our Republic. And, he dared to directly threaten the President of the United States.

Can’t wait to hear your answers.

Mr. Schiff

Published / by Lee Kessler / Leave a Comment

As a former citizen of the once great and now-decaying state of California, I have to tell you–as an expert in the mind, and the world of Propaganda Warfare–that you are an absolute and unrepentant, pathological liar.

For my fans, I have watched this man for the better part of 20 years, and none more closely than in the last three. It is said that elections have consequences. Well, that is certainly true. Whether you are Democrat or Republican, this past election had the consequence of placing a pathological liar and sociopath at the helm of the House Intelligence Committee. Think about that.

It would take hours for me to break down lie by lie to you, as I have periodically tuned in to see what he was saying, testifying to, or presenting to you, the American People. I do not have that time. You do not have that time. But, if you care to–and you dare to–you can communicate with me, and we will lay this out, detail by disgraceful detail.

But you need to KNOW, and really understand, that Inspector General Horowitz’s report stated the Nunes Memo to be true, the Schiff Memo to be false. (BASED UPON EVIDENCE AND INVESTIGATION) And that falsehood led to the disgraceful and very expensive Mueller Russia Investigation. And to the demise of the American Media.

I write fiction based on fact. It is your turn now. You either decide to run with liars who present fiction as fact, or you run with folks who present facts–even at GREAT PERSONAL RISK.

Adam Schiff will be memorialized in the history of the United States. If we survive as a Constitutional Republic, and the history books accurately portray this time, he will be a villain. Make no mistake about it. He is not the hero some would have you believe.

In this country, you are not guilty by accusation. You may have suffered such an injustice in your work, or even under the law. But it was nonetheless an injustice. Neither is President Trump guilty by accusation. You need to understand this is not a class thing. It is not a race thing. It is not a gender thing. It is an American thing.

Further, you have a right to be faced by your accuser. NO WHISTLE BLOWER CAN REMAIN ANONYMOUS. THEY CAN AND SHOULD BE PROTECTED FROM REPRISALS, BUT THEY MUST COME OUT AND FACE THE PERSON THEY ARE ACCUSING. Imagine a world where anyone could state anything, and remain anonymous. You could never defend yourself.

You are not presumed guilty until proven innocent. Neither you, nor the President, need to prove your innocence. Ever!!

Laws are clear, and need to be followed. This Washington debacle can not even site a law that has been broken. No crime, no evidence. Only Adam Schiff’s skillful, devious rhetoric alleges hoped-for crimes.

So, tell your Senators of both parties to end this with an acquittal tomorrow. Tell them not to be hoodwinked by a con artist the likes of which you have not seen before.

And, for all of you who have people convicted of crimes while he was a prosecutor in Los Angeles–and possibly still in prison– I suggest you get a really good lawyer and have EACH AND EVERY CASE REVIEWED FOR POSSIBLE WITHOLDING OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE. LOOK FOR PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT.

He did not just start down this path with the Impeachment of a President. He started down this path a long time ago. And, to my neighbors in Burbank, un-elect this disgraceful man in November.


A Warning from the Past

Published / by Lee Kessler / 3 Comments on A Warning from the Past

 “Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper.  Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle.  The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knowledge with the lies of the day. . . .  I will add, that the man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them; inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods & errors.” 

Attributed to Thomas Jefferson (June 11, 1807) – Principal author of the Declaration of Independence, 3rd, President of the United States from 1801 to 1809

Food for thought for today’s climate: What is “lying by omission?” And then ask yourself how devastating is it to you if the Press omits key facts that would allow you to properly evaluate?

You are the boss. Never forget that. 286 days!! Help is on the way!

Until we talk again.

They’re Back!

Published / by Lee Kessler / 1 Comment on They’re Back!

Remember the movie Poltergeist II, with cute little Heather O’Rourke sitting in front of her television, yelling in fear to her parents that the poltergeists had returned. “They’re back,” was one of the scariest lines in horror film history. Because we had seen the first movie, we knew just how awful the ensuing scenes were going to be. We braced ourselves to be traumatized and terrified, having to face yet Round Two with the malicious, deadly pranksters.

Well, brace yourselves America. For the last two weeks you could calmly turn on your TV to watch football, your favorite show, a parade, or even the evening news in some areas and not be tormented by demented cries of “Impeachment!” What a relief it was not to have to listen to our modern day supernatural spirits.

Regrettably, it’s over now. Our reprieve from the horror show in Washington, DC was granted to us by the Congress who went home to enjoy their lives for the holidays, while leaving us dangling and angry. Day by day though it seemed to slip into a memory, as if it were some scene from a nightmare we had awakened from. We may have even talked ourselves into believing that the House of Representatives had not in fact lost its mind.

But, the reprieve was fleeting I am afraid, as fleeting as the famous cease fire on Christmas Eve in the World War I. Sadly, Congress has returned to Washington.

They’re back!

What if? A Diabolical Long Game…

Published / by Lee Kessler / 8 Comments on What if? A Diabolical Long Game…

Many of you do not know me, or of me. I am not self-congratulating here, but rather setting the stage briefly for a picture and scenario I am looking at right now. I’m the author of the White King Trilogy–a series of political fiction suspense novels that shocked even Intelligence, Military, and Counterterrorism professionals in their accuracy over time.

In June of 2004, I was alarmed at the divisiveness in the country and set about to see what was causing it. I advanced a theory to myself, utilizing my professional acting background, my knowledge of the human mind and behavior, and my marketing background. I began with a “what if” exercise to identity the underlying motivation, and likely strategies and tactics, that one our worst real life enemies might deploy.

The first novel, “White King and the Doctor” revealed things you are living through right now–only it revealed them almost 15 years ago. The books have been regarded as prophetic. Don’t assume that I do not know what I am talking about.

Fortunately in my fiction, Andy Weir, the Grandmaster chess champion, figures out what this real-life, brilliant enemy is doing–what chess moves he would make in his long game to bring us down from within. Not to spoil the surprise, but Andy’s superior chess strategies and ability to “look” into the arena enabled him and his allies to thwart the worst bad guys in the world today.

So, this brings me to the historic Impeachment last night. That was insane enough, but Speaker Pelosi’s refusal then and today to send the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate for the trial are causing every commentator and politician in America today to be scratching their heads wondering and/or pontificating about why she’s doing it, what she wants, what she fears etc.

The cliched ones center around her knowing the case is absurd, and not wanting to see an acquittal, her looking for an off-ramp from the farce she acquiesced to, her desire to milk the most she can out of it before it dies. Or that she is buying time for some “Mitt Romney” to raise up insurgents in his own party. This is where my antennae went up, where I think the analysis is too shallow, too simple. Someone is diverting our attention. In chess, this analysis is rather myopic. Too short range. Too few moves that don’t lead to checkmate.

Whatever else Speaker Pelosi may or may not be, she is a very smart tactician, and so I did what I did long ago. I looked at this from a different angle, asked myself “what if?” and “saw” a different picture. There is not time for me to write another novel to expose this one. Buckle up friends. I hope I am wrong, but…

What if: Donald Trump has to be gotten rid of at all costs? What if his world view and successful actions threaten a 70 year plan to reshape an entire world order? And what if the timing of a trial right now–though thought to be desirable when Pelosi expected the public and the polls to turn against the President–would actually be the worst thing for that objective? What could the attackers do to make sure he does not get 4 more years.

Assuming the Speaker now knows that the trial will result in an acquittal, and that her party will not get a do-over in the House, and assuming she knows that even if by some miracle they got a conviction and removal, the President still could run again, as he is entitled to a second term.

Removing him in his first term then does not stop the President from running again (if I understand the Constitution), and being elected again. Remember, what if the goal is to stop him from the next four years?

Just spit-balling here. But, what if she and Shumer shift gears and turn all attention to the Senate for the election ahead? What if those two already know that Trump will get another 4 years, one way or the other? To shoot the wad of the Impeachment in the House, which will cost her in all likelihood the control of the House in 2021, leaves only the Senate as the chamber that could stop him in 2021–NOT 2020.

But to stop him, the Senate has to be flipped to Democrat. Then, a stalled Impeachment Trial would be hastily moved forward, and would be tried in a Democrat-controlled Senate. I think we all know how that would turn out.

At that point, the President would have been elected for his second term–and can not try again. If he is removed early in his second term, he can not come back, and the “deplorables” have no chess move to make. Please get this. If he is acquitted in 2020, he gets re-elected. Even if he is found guilty in 2020 and is removed before Nov. 3, 2020, he gets re-elected. He gets 4 more years and they will have failed to stop him–regardless of the verdict.


But, if he is found guilty in 2021after commencing his second term, he is removed, and he is gone–with no path back to the White House. Simple game then. She can lose the control of the House. They have already done their part in bringing the Impeachment.

She and others get 4 Republicans to lose their seats, while holding the Democrat Senate count. The Senate then goes to 51 Democrats, 49 Republicans instead of 53 Republicans to 47 Democrats right now.

The trial goes ahead, and on strict party lines, the President is convicted and removed–in her mind sparing the country–and the world–4 more years of the President’s reforms.

If all they need is 4 Senators to lose their seats, that is a winnable game. What if Speaker Pelosi sees the long game, sees a series of chess moves, and foresees checkmate? What if none of this is being done “on the fly” being “made up as they go?” Or even if that did happen, what if the strategist that she is has “looked” down the road, and saw an opportunity to do something that a current trial could never accomplish? Removed now, he comes back at some point. Removed in 2021, he is gone.

If you do not see her make a move to send the Articles over to the Senate in a matter of days, then pay close attention my friends. This is one I would rather be wrong about.

“What if?”…I do not have time to write the novel, juicy though it would be. If any of this resonates, you need to get this Blog, and some of my historical Blogs to people in power, and who have the influence. Get it to the White House, to any talk show host who would understand it. All it takes sometimes is for people to “spot” the attack, to see the “tell” in the con, and they instantly figure out a way to thwart it. The problem with playing with a Grandmaster chess champion is that often the checkmate move was made early on–with many ensuing moves by the unsuspecting opponent–and ultimately the opponent suddenly experiences the ambush and hears the awful word, “Checkmate.”

Is she that good? Are her global handlers that good? I don’t know. But WHAT IF?